fbpx

The Exorcism – movie review

A former star actor with a dark past tries to make a comeback in Joshua John Miller’s The Exorcism.

Russell Crowe plays the actor, Anthony Miller. He’s cast as a priest, Father Arlington, in a supernatural horror film involving an exorcism. Miller was an altar boy who was molested. His wife became very ill with cancer and died. He took to drink and drugs. He has an uneasy relationship with his 16-year-old daughter Lee (Ryan Simpkins). She calls her father “Tony”, much to his chagrin. She’s been expelled from school, but Miller has managed to reduce it to a suspension. But, as she isn’t due to resume school until the following semester. So when he’s cast in the horror movie, she becomes his personal assistant.

Miller struggles with the role. He can’t remember his lines. He doesn’t invest in the character, causing angst to the director Peter (Adam Goldberg), who took a big risk in casting him. Peter is seeking authenticity and implores Miller to confront past traumas in realising Father Arlington. But this only hastens Miller’s decline. Miller goes back to the bottle, gets off his meds, sleepwalks and has blackouts. Meanwhile, Lee – a budding scriptwriter – strikes up a relationship with Blake Holloway (Chloe Bailey). Holloway is the young actor cast as the possessed person in the film.

Lee is beside herself watching her father’s descent. She eventually turns to a consultant priest on the movie, Father George Conor (David Hyde Pierce) – who is also a clinical psychologist – for help. As chaos reigns, the only answer is to perform an exorcism on Anthony Miller.

Director Joshua John Miller wrote the script for The Exorcism alongside M.A. Fortin. The film’s origins stem from the mother of all horror movies, The Exorcist. As a child, Josh watched his dad, Jason Miller as doomed Father Damien Karras, fling himself out a window in that film’s climax. Jason told Josh how “cursed” The Exorcist was, outlining the litany of disasters that accompanied the picture.

The filmmakers have employed all the tools of the trade – darkness, flickering lights, creepy sounds, religious objects – in bringing the subject to life anew. I appreciated the first two thirds of the film more than the run home, when matters really got out of hand for the protagonists. I thought the set up was strong and the acting solid.

With that superb timbre in his voice, Russell Crowe is credible as the angst-riddled protagonist. He’s a bundle of contradictions, with much repenting to do. Ryan Simpkins is a dab hand in establishing the awkward relationship between daughter and father. I thought the push-and-pull in her persona was one of the movie’s highlights. Chloe Bailey adds another layer, playing a character with her own issues. Sam Worthington is under-utilised as another actor cast in movie.

So, the building blocks leading to Anthony Miller’s downfall were well realised, but I wasn’t sold on the exorcism. Perhaps, I have seen too many films about exorcisms and it all seems a bit twee to me by now.  Often, I’m wanting to yell at the screen, but I just didn’t really buy it here. The difficulty with all filmmakers tackling this subject is how to maintain believability. Those associated with The Exorcism are no different. The high-water mark was set with The Exorcist and everything else appears shaded as a result.

Still, I don’t want to suggest there’s nothing to enjoy about The Exorcism.  Relationships are well-established and the plot has its fair share of intrigue and jump scares. I also loved the meta nature of what’s going on in the movie-within-a-movie.

Alex First

Other reviews you might enjoy: