Theatre Review

The Winterling

Company: Red Stitch
Venue:
Red Stitch Actors' Theatre, St Kilda, Melbourne
Dates: To 19 Apr 2008

Send us your feedback
on this review

 

 


Visit theblurbmagazine's
myspace!

Advertise with us |
About us
|
Our privacy policy

 


In the winter dark

Jez Butterworth, like Sarah Kane and Mark Ravenhill burst onto the theatre scene on that tidal wave of new British writers at the Royal Court Theatre in the mid nineties . His play Mojo, a thriller set amongst London’s gangland, appeared at the same time as Kane’s Blasted putting him, at 26, into the front rank of those emerging writers. Not as prolific as Ravenhill, Patrick Marber and the others – The Winterling is his third play since Mojo – he is, nonetheless, consolidating some extraordinary skills with theatrical language. The Night Heron, a grotesque comedy-thriller, left London for a rural marshland where, like a modern-day Peter Grimes, weird loners lived, shunned by the even weirder locals. The Winterling combines both mixing urban 'crims' with rural ones.

The setting is a derelict Dartmoor farmhouse under an air force flight path where West (Nicholas Bell) has summoned his old partner in crime, Wally (Steven Adams). The third member of the gang turns out to have killed himself and Wally has brought, instead, his ‘son-in-law’ (the son, in any case, of Wally's latest 'bird' Rita) Pasty (Martin Sharpe). Reviews of the London premiere brought comparisons with the plays of Harold Pinter. The characters certainly might resemble a gallery of Pinter memorables; an amiable and talkative tramp straight out of The Caretaker, a mysterious and menacing overlord straight out of No Man’s Land – even going from controller to controlled like Hirst in that play – and two brutal thugs like in The Dumb Waiter, The Birthday Party, No Man’s Land, or even the brothers in The Homecoming. Even the presence of a whorishly provocative woman, if not directly influenced by Pinter give the feeling that you are watching a Pinter-esque play. But Butterworth, like Kane, Ravenhill and the others reached far back beyond Pinter to the grandiose revenge plays of the Jacobeans. In an atmosphere of constant and growing menace West, instead of planning some new heist, assuming the servile West and surly Patsy had some part in the death of the ex-colleague, alternately cajoles and intimidates the pair into submission before they retire to their rooms for the night. By the end of the act it seems some terrible act of revenge will take place.

The second act jarringly opens with a scene that could be a flashback or a flash forward, the victimiser now - or then – a victim before re connecting with the first act and playing with the new power shift. But even then Butterworth builds suspense or revulsion from unlikely sources. The tramp Draycott (Adrian Mulraney) brandishes a pig’s heart while the woman Lue (Ella Caldwell) clutches a box on her first entrance, a favourite theatre prop for storing severed heads from Emlyn Williams’s Night Must Fall back to any number of Jacobean snuff epics.

Butterworth’s language is vivid as the Jacobeans’ too, and riddled with metaphors. A Wally is derogatory term for an inept fool, for example, and the wally here cowers and stumbles. The language too has a constantly masks its violence behind a Pinter-esque banality. West for example, has Wally and patsy out of their muddy trousers and into nervous submission then having sent the upstartish Patsy back out into the muddy and dark moors to fetch cigarettes, questions him about a local historical sight, the aggression behind the questioning growing by the minute. The dialogue bristles with overt and implied violence. “You don’t sleep out here, Wally,” says West after inviting him to spend the night. “You fall asleep out here, something creeps up and eats you”.

Conversations about sleep are often loaded with suspenseful malice or even premonitions: West catalogues the amount of sleep needed by the famous or notorious, ending with the revelation that the Yorkshire Ripper slept 18 hours per day. Come the power shift in the second act, that information injects Wally’s statement that he slept well and the whole night with a shot of adrenaline in preparation for the tense final scene. Again the metaphors set up the impact. A new pact is made with a new objective and a new victim. As they discuss grisly task at hand you suddenly realise Patsy also means ‘someone who is deceived and made a victim’. Without giving too much away this is the point where many an armrest was clenched and most eyes were suddenly on the exit door looking for an escape from this final twist in the plot. Some things defy logic, like West's interrogation of Patsy over the details of an historical site that Patsy would only have seen for a few minutes in the dark. Like the time play between scenes and acts these operate on an internal logic that feeds back into the play like the fear it generates and consumes. The end leaves some tantalising possibilities, not least who did what to whom but who is in charge. I left wondering if the sinister Draycott might be more than is revealed and the farmhouse is a refuge for traumatised assault victims.

British theatre has provided a lot of visceral thrills across the last decade, Butterworth, to his credit has done it with words. The plays language seems to almost impossible to keep afloat. The central scenes for the three Londoners and then the incidental, almost red-herring, ones for the rambling tramp and escape-proof Lue are difficult juggling acts of necessary ambiguity and then hard driven suspense. Director Andrew Gray has it happen within an uncluttered acting area. Who is or might be in charge is suggested by an actor taking centre stage or sitting in a chair that represents a seat of power or a seat of interrogation. The actors seem to pitch their performances up a couple of sizes more than naturalistic to give an atmosphere of panic at some points. The three Londoners dominate the action, the locals Draycott and Lue are left to form endless possibilities. Bell, an actor often in plays where he is reacting to bad situations here creates one of his own. He can pull his upper lip back to speak a line like a snarling dog or make a simple offer of drink sound terrifying. Crowned, like his London counterpart in the premiere, with a ridiculous hat - a boy hardly out of his teens sporting such a middle-aged accessory - Sharpe creates an irritatingly whinging East-Ender without being over mannered. Patsy's wordy whining, like his description of his mother as a "mooer you wouldn't even shag in a space suit" is the source of much of the plays humor and all the more credit to Sharpe since the part seems impossibly difficult for a non Cockney to play. Adams is great the sweaty, cringing wally of a Wally but best when transformed by that good night’s sleep.

Peter Mumford’s set opens out the familiar but restricted acting space with second room featuring a rear window and view onto a desolate landscape. As soon as you enter the theatre the mood is one of unsubtle menace. The farmhouse set could almost be a torture chamber. An axe leans by the fireplace, a circular saw blade the size of a bicycle wheel lies in the grate. Chains hang from the ceiling, iron shears hang on the wall, a sickle sits on the mantle piece and an evil looking washing mangle lurks in a corner. Even the location (one of England’s largest and oldest prisons is in Dartmoor, as well a setting for numerous crime stories including Conan Doyle’s The Hound of the Baskervilles) is foreboding.

Michael Magnusson

To read more of Michael Mangusson's theatre reviews, check out his blog at On Stage (and walls) Melbourne.

 

Advertisement