Movie Review

 

In the Valley of Elah

Director: Paul Haggis
Cast:
Tommy Lee Jones, Charlize Theron, Jason Patric, Josh Brolin and Susan Sarandon
Releasing:
28 Feb 2008
Rated
MA 15+

Send us your feedback
on this review

 

Advertise with us |
About us
|
Our privacy policy

 


Into the lonesome valley

After the unexpected success of Crash, which dealt with racism in America, Paul Haggis turns his sights squarely on another hot-button issue with In the Valley of Elah. This time, the topic is America’s ill-fated adventure in Iraq; and more particularly, its effect on those called on to fight in that conflict.

Haggis is of course better known as a writer than as a director, and it shines through in his script. There’s a lot going on here, with layers building on layers as the story unfolds. Haggis also demonstrates why he’s in such demand as a writer, as he propels the film along and conveys meaning with few words.

Tommy Lee Jones is Hank Deerfield, a retired military policeman now living a quiet life in rural Tennessee. His son Mike (Jonathan Tucker) has been on a tour of duty in Iraq. His unit has returned home, but Mike is reported missing. Knowing what that could mean for Mike’s career, Hank drives to his base in New Mexico in an effort to find him, leaving his wife Joan (Susan Sarandon) to wait by the phone. In New Mexico, Hank soon runs into a series of dead-ends, as the military authorities seem reluctant to become involved. He tries to find a sympathetic ear with the civilian police, and thinks he may have found one in the form of Det. Emily Sanders (Charlize Theron); but she too doesn’t seem all that enthused. But the discovery of human remains in a desolate field changes everything.

The title, which is explained in the movie, comes from the Biblical story of David and Goliath; the valley of Elah being the place where their decisive battle takes place. It’s a rather frank metaphor for Hank’s battle with military officialdom to find out what has happened to his son. That however is about the only straightforward thing about the film, as Haggis takes us on a reflective and compelling journey through the heart of America’s current darkness.

The interplay between military and civilian authority has been done before (think The Presidio for example), and the military are predictably again the bad guys of the piece; but here Haggis transcends the obvious to produce a film that’s a complex interplay of politics, mystery and raw emotion. He uses the structure of a murder-mystery to explore his themes, but this is far more than a police procedural.

There’s an elegiac tone to the film that suits not just the subject-matter, but also the array of deep passions on display. That tone is not only reflected in the visual and sonic landscape that Haggis has created; but also – and perhaps most tellingly - in the craggy features and bleary eyes of Hank as he searches for his answers.

Like the Coen brothers’ No Country for Old Men, it’s set in the bleak southern border area of the US. The coincidence doesn’t end there however, as the stark beauty of the place is once more captured by Roger Deakins. Unlike the Coens however, Haggis tends to concentrate more on the decaying urban environment than on the countryside. The story takes place mostly in run-down motels, squalid bars and greasy diners than in the haunting landscape itself. Haggis seems to be using these images as a way of reflecting a moral or perhaps even spiritual decline in his characters.

The film unfolds at what might be described as a leisurely pace. The running time is close to 2 hours, but on reflection, it’s had to pinpoint any scene that could be regarded as superfluous or redundant. Despite taking a while to get going, once it does, Haggis certainly ramps up the tension as the events unfold. It’s also a film that makes demands on the audience, and not just because it doesn’t allow its characters to explain everything for you. Many scenes that might appear unimportant turn out to be very important later in the film, so it requires that you pay close attention from the outset.

Haggis clearly has considerable pull in Hollywood these days, as the star-studded (with no less than three Oscar winners) cast attests. Charlize Theron again undergoes a chameleon-like transformation to play the dowdy Sanders. That she gets to play both hard-nosed cop and doting mother only serves to highlight her range. Susan Sarandon is achingly effective as the heart-broken and world-weary Joan. Even if her involvement is limited to a few scenes, those scenes are some of the most important in the film.

In the Valley of Elah however belongs to Tommy Lee Jones, justly rewarded with an Oscar nomination for this performance. In his leathery face and melodious voice, the pain of a father robbed of his child well up with an intensity that’s palpable. While his performance here isn’t all that different from his supporting turn in No Country for Old Men, this carries far more gravitas and engagement with the audience. This is just the kind of performance that should be recognised with an Oscar nod.

There will be many films this year dealing with the US involvement in Iraq. Few however are likely to deal with that issue in such a sensitive and rewarding way as In the Valley of Elah. It’s another fine film from Haggis, whose stock seems to rise with each passing day. This is certainly one film not to be missed.

David Edwards

 

Advertisement