Art Feature

Blake Prize for Religious Art 2007 - a view

Venue: NAS Gallery, Darlinghurst, Sydney
Dates:
30 August to 29 September 2007
Cost:
Free

Send us your feedback
on this article

 

 


Visit theblurbmagazine's
myspace!

Advertise with us |
About us
|
Our privacy policy

 


Almighty row

Shirley Purdie - Stations of the CrossWhile debate rages about content on television, a furore of a rather different kind has reared up over art – specifically, the Blake Prize for Religious Art. Now, as regular readers will undoubtedly be aware, another Sydney-based art prize (the Archibald) regularly courts controversy; but the Blake Prize has tended to fly under the radar somewhat. After all, it’s an award given for a very specialised (and some might argue, marginal) field of artistic endeavour, its accompanying exhibition is generally shown outside the “big” galleries, and it tends to get little media coverage.

This year however has been different. Ironically perhaps, the storm surrounding the awards wasn’t about the winners; but rather about two works shown in the Blake exhibition that weren’t among the judges’ favourites.

The two pieces in question were Priscilla Bracks’ hologram work titled “Bearded Orientals: Making the Empire Cross”; and Luke Sullivan’s scultpure, “The Fourth Secret of Fatima”. The reason these two pieces (particularly Bracks’) stirred so much passion is their juxtaposition of Christian iconography with elements that many would find inimical to the Christian faith.

In “Bearded Orientals: Making the Empire Cross”, Bracks creates a holographic "diptych" of sorts, showing a traditional depiction of Jesus and a photo of Osama bin Laden, which can morph into one another. Understandably, some were quick to see the work as somehow lauding the terrorist and were equally quick to express their outrage.

The Herld-Sun’s neocon and anti-intelligensia columnist Andrew Bolt railed:

“To the casual viewer, the meaning would seem as obvious as the gap where the Twin Towers used to be – that bin Laden and Christ really aren’t so different. Indeed, one might have created the other. Hmm: Jesus – the true author of the September 11 attacks.”

Had Bolt bothered to talk to the artist however, he might have found a rather different meaning. As the Herald-Sun’s Sydney sister paper, The Daily Telegraph reported:

“Bracks says her intention in creating Bearded Orientals was to pose the question: Is the Western media inadvertently turning Osama bin Laden into a cult hero for posterity?”

In other words, Bracks seems to see Jesus as the ultimate cult hero, and is questioning whether the media is seeking to effectively deify bin Laden. Which, in a way, appears to be generally supportive of Bolt’s position on such matters.

For Sullivan’s work, the issue was similar, though probably not quite so incendiary. “The Fourth Secret of Fatima” was a statue depicting the Virgin Mary dressed in a Muslim burqa. This is of course the kind of ironic counterpointing that would be familiar to many art followers. The fact that the counterpoint in this specific case is the Muslim religion seems to have gotten up people’s noses.

Some however were prepared to focus on the artistic merits – or otherwise – of the pieces, with the Bishop of South Sydney, the Rt. Rev. Robert Forsyth saying the Sullivan statue was a “cheap shot”. He was however kinder to Bracks’ piece, saying “It kind of works for me – it’s arresting”.

Now the drama has spread to the higher levels of Australian churches, with the Catholic Archbishop of Sydney, Cardinal George Pell, weighing in. As reported in the Daily Tele, he said:

“Some contemporary art is tedious and trivial. These works demonstrate this. Regrettably, attempts to insult Jesus and Mary have become common in recent years, even predictable. Too often it seems that the only quality which makes something art is the adolescent desire to shock. If this is the best the Blake Prize can do, it has probably outlived its usefulness.”

Of course, the difficulty for His Eminence is that these were the works that DIDN’T win. The actual prize was awarded to indigenous artist Shirley Purdie for her work Stations of the Cross, which renders the traditional Easter devotion using indigenous art techniques and colours. The stark rendering clearly won over the judges who commented:

“It is a marvellously realised painterly journey that recreates the stories told to the artist in childhood of the Stations of the Cross in Warmun country using a breathtakingly beautiful natural ochre palette made from the earths eroded from the very Kimberley rocks whose mobile shapes enclose and frame the vignettes of story.”

The judges highly commended Rodney Pople’s painting, “The Last Supper”; and gave the John Coburn Award for Emerging Artists to Jumaadi for the work “Whisper”.

The fact that the winners were lost in the hullabaloo over two entries deemed not worthy by the judges is probably telling in itself. But as the saying goes – there’s no such thing as bad publicity. Of course, bagging off an award like the Blake is an easy way to fill column inches and provoke debate, but I personally am disappointed that the controversy has taken the focus off the works that actually won prizes.

Sadly, the whole episode seems to have generated a lot more heat than light.

David Edwards

 

Advertisement